![]() Which may partially balance out the drastic differences mentioned above - after all, one doesn't wait for thermal equilibrium to be reached before drinking a whiskey. On the other hand, soapstone is able to absorb heat at a faster pace (and it is able to absorb more heat than non-melting ice). The outer layer will slowly melt (this is a negligible effect since it's a very thin layer that is melting 3). Instead, just the outer layer will be at 0C, and there will be a drastic temperature gradient on going inwards. I guess that it takes a while for the ice to reach the 0C state uniformly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |